mozilla-license

1998-04-01 - 1998-05-01 (103 messages)

1998-03-01 - 1998-04-01 (520 messages)

 Next  Last 

  1. 1998-03-31  [3] Re: License                                           mozilla-l Daniel Veditz
  2. 1998-03-31 [25] A statement on NPL/MPL/GPL licensing issues           mozilla-l Andy Tai 
  3. 1998-03-31 [39] How Netscape would benefit from NPL-GPL compatibility mozilla-l Alan Shutko 
  4. 1998-03-31  [4] Source Code 1 - Documentation 0                       mozilla-l nuke
  5. 1998-03-30  [2] Woldwide notification for pennies!                    mozilla-l NOD3u5rOS
  6. 1998-03-28  [1] LGPL/GPL licensing issues Was: Re: A statement on NPL mozilla-l Alan Braggins
  7. 1998-03-28  [1] GPL is a joke anyways                                 mozilla-l nospam
  8. 1998-03-28  [2] In the interests of Netscape....                      mozilla-l robert havoc 
  9. 1998-03-28  [3] Technical screwage (Re: Netscape Public License draft mozilla-l Tim Hurley 
 10. 1998-03-28  [1] A way to make the GPL compatible with NPL/MPL         mozilla-l John Marter 
 11. 1998-03-27  [2] Re: RMS Encourages NPL+GPL Software!!!                mozilla-l Vladimir Alex
 12. 1998-03-27  [5] Re: Applause RMS's Comments                           mozilla-l Igor Boukanov
 13. 1998-03-27  [1] Re: test                                              mozilla-l Barry/OKane 
 14. 1998-03-27  [2] Re: To anyone at Netscape...                          mozilla-l Daniel Veditz
 15. 1998-03-27  [1] Netscape & Desktop: Microsoft: Yes, Gnome/KDE: No     mozilla-l Leevi Marttil
 16. 1998-03-26 [12] Linux                                                 mozilla-l Marko Schulz 
 17. 1998-03-26  [1] A little question                                     mozilla-l rbrabe 
 18. 1998-03-26  [1] Is an Executable a Modification by Definition?        mozilla-l Craig Milo Ro
 19. 1998-03-26 [17] Netscape Public License draft 0.95 available          mozilla-l Steven Ehrbar
 20. 1998-03-26  [2] 1.2 Section B vs #include'd files                     mozilla-l Craig Milo Ro
 21. 1998-03-25  [7] Does the NPL allow Microsoft to embrace and extends M mozilla-l Brian Behlend
 22. 1998-03-25  [1] The URL                                               mozilla-l Adam Debus 
 23. 1998-03-25  [7] Re: Idea (not wish): Text Browser                     mozilla-l Simon P Lucy 
 24. 1998-03-24 [27] Re: NPL (only!) is fine for me :-)                    mozilla-l Vladimir Alex
 25. 1998-03-23  [3] Incomprehensible limitations?                         mozilla-l Frank Hecker 
 26. 1998-03-23  [2] Require Link Kits(?)                                  mozilla-l Daniel Veditz
 27. 1998-03-23  [6] Questions about the license                           mozilla-l Information D
 28. 1998-03-23  [3] Lose the advertising clause of the MPL                mozilla-l Anthony Marti
 29. 1998-03-23  [1] Typo in NPL-0.95 section 6.3 "Derivate Works"?        mozilla-l Adam J. Richt
 30. 1998-03-22  [3] NPL<->GPL can cooperate some                          mozilla-l Jared Showalt

 Next  Last