[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: feature branch during freeze
From: zander () kde ! org
Date: 2010-09-08 12:15:16
Message-ID: 201009081415.17072.zander () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wednesday 8. September 2010 09.41.34 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 September 2010, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> > First all, no one can prevent anyone to make his own branch, or a group
> > to make his own branch for any purpose, or to work on anything. We have
> > to acknowledge that some people have different agendas, different goal.
> >
> > At the end of the day, people who work on bug fixing will get the credits
> > to have made KOffice ready.
> >
> > On Tuesday 07 September 2010, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 7. September 2010 20.29.20 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > > > Again, it's a matter of trust and attitude.
> > >
> > > And of experience; the last time it was clear that a large part of our
> > > regular contributor did not fix any bugs on the main branch.
> >
> > I guess, it varies from applications to applications... In Krita bugs
> > were fixed in trunk, otherwise you would get a spanking from its
> > maintainer. I suggest other maintainers do the same with their slav^D
> > euhm contributors. In other word, this branch is a *new-feature-only*
> > branch, people should not commit bug fixes there, they should commit it
> > to trunk. Hopefully, the game rule is clear.
>
> Exactly :-).
>
> Of course, for Krita this time everyone's focus is on polishing 2.3, since
> that's the big release that we're going to amaze the world with. But even
> so, I think that Pentalis wants to hack on a halftone brush -- so he would
> work on the branch.
Everyone can make their own decision; I suggest Pentalis use git-svn instead
as that is easier to cope with for one project.
The thead was to start a new feature branch for koffice features. I think we
should all support the "make 2.3 really really good" effort and actively
encourage people fixing bugs. Creating a new branch for features goes in the
opposite direction.
So to follow up to Cyrilles point; the rules are really clear now. Trunk is
closed for new features. You are making the game plan unclear by starting a
feature branch.
--
Thomas Zander
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic