[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: feature branch during freeze
From:       Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date:       2010-09-08 7:41:34
Message-ID: 201009080941.34458.boud () valdyas ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 08 September 2010, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> First all, no one can prevent anyone to make his own branch, or a group to 
> make his own branch for any purpose, or to work on anything. We have to 
> acknowledge that some people have different agendas, different goal.
> 
> At the end of the day, people who work on bug fixing will get the credits to 
> have made KOffice ready.
> 
> On Tuesday 07 September 2010, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > On Tuesday 7. September 2010 20.29.20 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > > Again, it's a matter of trust and attitude.
> > 
> > And of experience; the last time it was clear that a large part of our
> > regular contributor did not fix any bugs on the main branch.
> 
> I guess, it varies from applications to applications... In Krita bugs were 
> fixed in trunk, otherwise you would get a spanking from its maintainer. I 
> suggest other maintainers do the same with their slav^D euhm contributors. In 
> other word, this branch is a *new-feature-only* branch, people should not 
> commit bug fixes there, they should commit it to trunk. Hopefully, the game 
> rule is clear.

Exactly :-).

Of course, for Krita this time everyone's focus is on polishing 2.3, since that's the \
big release that we're going to amaze the world with. But even so, I think that \
Pentalis wants to hack on a halftone brush -- so he would work on the branch.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org
Ceterum censeo lapsum particulorum probae delendum esse
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]