[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-usability
Subject: Re: Tab movement [Re: kdebase/konqueror]
From: Stephan Binner <binner () kde ! org>
Date: 2003-12-25 12:58:42
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 14:53, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > Then let's drop it. What speaks against Ctrl+, and Ctrl+. as alternatives
> > for people with short fingers and Portuguese/Brazillian keyboard users?
> Nothing I guess. Although they hardly symbolises anything ;)
True. But they are placed side by side on most keyboard, don't require to
press a third key (Shift) for both or even only one direction and are com-
fortable with one hand usage. So any objection or other opinion against it?
Btw, concerning your desktop/window switching consistency argument: Desktops
and windows don't really have a fixed orientation to each other, it's only
forward or backward (with Shift) switching in a list. Tabs are always left
or right of each other, so it's better to choose keys which reflect this.
Bye,
Steve
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic