From kde-usability Thu Dec 25 12:58:42 2003 From: Stephan Binner Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 12:58:42 +0000 To: kde-usability Subject: Re: Tab movement [Re: kdebase/konqueror] X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-usability&m=107235733032076 On Tuesday 23 December 2003 14:53, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > Then let's drop it. What speaks against Ctrl+, and Ctrl+. as alternatives > > for people with short fingers and Portuguese/Brazillian keyboard users? > Nothing I guess. Although they hardly symbolises anything ;) True. But they are placed side by side on most keyboard, don't require to press a third key (Shift) for both or even only one direction and are com- fortable with one hand usage. So any objection or other opinion against it? Btw, concerning your desktop/window switching consistency argument: Desktops and windows don't really have a fixed orientation to each other, it's only forward or backward (with Shift) switching in a list. Tabs are always left or right of each other, so it's better to choose keys which reflect this. Bye, Steve _______________________________________________ kde-usability mailing list kde-usability@mail.kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability