[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-linux
Subject:    Re: [kde-linux] what are crypto plug-ins?
From:       John Andersen <jsa () pen ! homeip ! net>
Date:       2004-07-29 7:13:52
Message-ID: 200407282313.53011.jsa () pen ! homeip ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Monday 26 July 2004 07:49 am, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Monday 26 July 2004 06:50, Trevor Smith wrote:
> > On July 26, 2004 1:39 am, Pollywog wrote:
> > > Try it with the plugin and then without and you will see the difference
> > > better than I can explain it.  The plugin takes the work out of it, all
> > > you do is download your mail and if you have the sender's key, Kmail
> > > verifies the sig without the extra work.
> >
> > ?? There was no extra work without the plugin that I was aware of. Kmail
> > verified all sigs that I had keys for. It also encrypted/decrypted
> > seemlessly just with GnuPG. (Not attachments though.)
>
> I think the GnuPG integration does only handle inline signatures, not MIME
> mulitpart message where the signature is a separate, non visible, part of
> the message body (like in this mail)

Say What?  

You just sent this in a multi-part message and gnupgp (via kmai)l handled it
just fine.

Here's the raw text pasted in -------------begin paste----------

Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
  boundary="===============0703509805=="
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pen.homeip.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
	version=2.63
Status: R
X-Status: N
X-KMail-EncryptionState:  
X-KMail-SignatureState:  
X-KMail-MDN-Sent:  


--===============0703509805==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_bgSBBFS8ylLHZ2N";
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--Boundary-02=_bgSBBFS8ylLHZ2N
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday 26 July 2004 06:50, Trevor Smith wrote:
> On July 26, 2004 1:39 am, Pollywog wrote:
> > Try it with the plugin and then without and you will see the difference
> > better than I can explain it.  The plugin takes the work out of it, all
> > you do is download your mail and if you have the sender's key, Kmail
> > verifies the sig without the extra work.
>
> ?? There was no extra work without the plugin that I was aware of. Kmail
> verified all sigs that I had keys for. It also encrypted/decrypted
> seemlessly just with GnuPG. (Not attachments though.)

I think the GnuPG integration does only handle inline signatures, not MIME=
=20

---------end-paste---------------

-- 
_____________________________________
John Andersen

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde-linux mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-linux.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]