[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: Selections on the Adjustment layers
From:       Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date:       2009-09-04 9:25:03
Message-ID: 200909041125.03657.boud () valdyas ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 03 September 2009, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Boudewijn Rempt <boud@valdyas.org> wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 September 2009, Dmitry Kazakov wrote:
> > > We can easily change this behavior - a thumbnail of ANY layer will show
> >
> > the
> >
> > > resulting projection with all the masks applied. This won't be quite
> > > logical, but there is no barrier in implementation.
> >
> > Actually, that's the way I wanted it all the time, just like with group
> > layers: a thumbnail shows the rendered projection of a layer
> 
> This doesn't make sense for me. The thumbnail would change even if the
> content of the layer doesn't change,
> It might also confuse users coming from the other editors.

But the masks are part of the content of a layer, just like the layers in a 
group are part of the group layer -- so it makes sense to use the rendered 
projection in the thumbnail for a layer.

> What's wrong with adjustment layer + group layer? Ok it wastes some space,
> but it's not like we are really saving space in the layerbox anyway.

I must be missing something here?


-- 
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org
_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]