[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: Translation Methods comparsion
From:       "Federico Leva (Nemo)" <nemowiki () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-04-01 15:01:34
Message-ID: 5159A14E.9070800 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Luigi Toscano, 01/04/2013 16:38:
>> Thanks for mentioning it. I won't comment however because I lievae
>> interpretation of KDE principles to KDE. :)
>
> If you need to interact with the KDE project, so somehow becoming part of it,
> it's important to know it.

Sure.

> The data needed to rebuild the service (see the manifesto).

The needed data continues being all in the repository.

>
>>
>>> An internal instance of translatewiki is most likely to be accepted as the
>>> aforementioned points are more likely to be satisfied.
>>>
>>> Please note that this problem must be solved before the first automated commit
>>> starts to appear, or it would lead to troubles (I suspect starting with the
>>> suspension of the accounts used for it).
>>
>> No account could be suspended, because as Niklas said  «Nobody is going to
>> share any keys with anyone. Translatewiki.net admins will commit all
>> translations on regular intervals using their own keys » (2013-03-17 15:12:57).
>> If you don't want commits to happen (yet), you don't give commit access and
>> nothing starts. :)
>
> Again, does it mean that anyone, registered to translatewiki but not
> registered as KDE Contributor can potentially commit to the KDE translation
> repository because their contributions will be committed using the keys of
> Translatewiki.net admins? If the Translatewiki.net admins are not checking the
> translations, but simply synchronizing them, this is against the registration
> rule I mentioned before, and a call for suspension of Translatewiki.net admin
> keys.
> Could you please clarify this point?

Could you clarify what you mean *exactly* by "checking the translations"?

Nemo
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]