[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: OT: Why was artsd written?
From:       Hetz Ben Hamo <hetz () kde ! org>
Date:       2001-08-21 11:19:14
[Download RAW message or body]

Esound is a piece of bloatware - try to use it's network options and see what 
I means... (in terms of memory/processor)

It's so bad - that the Gnome people themselves want to replace it with other 
alternatives...

-- 
Hetz Ben Hamo
hetz@kde.org

On Tuesday 21 August 2001 14:15, Danie Roux wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 02:01:00PM +0300, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > Hi Jonathan, others...
> >
> > The biggest disadvantage of Red Carpet (at least in #kde channel on IRC)
> > is that its using the "competing" desktop's technology. I personally have
> > no problem to use it - as we say "use the right tool for the right job"
> > and IMHO - it is the right tool, so the disadvantage is more "political"
> > then technical (which makes me wonder - we use libXML from gnome and no
> > one seems to have problem with it) - so it's up to the core-devel team to
> > decide wether to embrace it or not...
>
> esound works great, to me it just seems that artd replaces esound while
> adding nothing new.
>
> Why? Or am I wrong?
>
> It would be a great if KDE and GNOME shared as much as possible
> technologies.A KPart and Bonobo bridge/merge would be a great step forward
> for example.

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]