[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    OT: Why was artsd written?
From:       Danie Roux <droux () tuks ! co ! za>
Date:       2001-08-21 11:15:41
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 02:01:00PM +0300, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi Jonathan, others...
> 
> The biggest disadvantage of Red Carpet (at least in #kde channel on IRC) is 
> that its using the "competing" desktop's technology. I personally have no 
> problem to use it - as we say "use the right tool for the right job" and IMHO 
> - it is the right tool, so the disadvantage is more "political" then 
> technical (which makes me wonder - we use libXML from gnome and no one seems 
> to have problem with it) - so it's up to the core-devel team to decide wether 
> to embrace it or not...
 
esound works great, to me it just seems that artd replaces esound while adding
nothing new. 

Why? Or am I wrong?

It would be a great if KDE and GNOME shared as much as possible technologies.A
KPart and Bonobo bridge/merge would be a great step forward for example.

-- 
Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]