[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Build KMail only?
From:       Tom Albers <toma () kde ! org>
Date:       2011-07-10 16:35:27
Message-ID: a4afdf66-ae7e-4548-b99c-a22928c7c6f2 () contact ! kovoks ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]



----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> On 07/10/2011 04:34 PM, Tom Albers wrote:
> > Calling technology of fellow community members cruft is very
> > disrespectful. I suggest you read the
> > CoC:http://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/
> > 
> > Best,
> 
> The definition of "cruft" is "anything unpleasant that accumulates
> over
> time".  This discussion is about the problems that Akonadi and other
> dependencies represent to those who wish to port KMail to other
> platforms.  Akonadi may have it's value, which isn't disputed here,
> but
> you have to agree that in this case it represents an unpleasant
> addition
> to KMail.  Therefore, it is only possible to interpret the use of
> this
> expression of this particular term as being very disrespectful if you
> interpret any reference to any problem that it may cause to anyone as
> being very disrespectful.  And that isn't true.

You can talk all you want, you called akonadi and friends 'cruft' and I find that \
disrespectful and unneeded, you could have conveyed exactly the same message without \
                the addition of the word 'cruft'.
-- 
Tom Albers

 
> > Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]