[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Build KMail only?
From:       Rui Maciel <rui.maciel () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-07-10 16:20:19
Message-ID: 4E19D143.7050804 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 07/10/2011 04:34 PM, Tom Albers wrote:
> Calling technology of fellow community members cruft is very disrespectful. I \
> suggest you read the CoC:http://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/ 
> Best,

The definition of "cruft" is "anything unpleasant that accumulates over 
time".  This discussion is about the problems that Akonadi and other 
dependencies represent to those who wish to port KMail to other 
platforms.  Akonadi may have it's value, which isn't disputed here, but 
you have to agree that in this case it represents an unpleasant addition 
to KMail.  Therefore, it is only possible to interpret the use of this 
expression of this particular term as being very disrespectful if you 
interpret any reference to any problem that it may cause to anyone as 
being very disrespectful.  And that isn't true.


Rui Maciel
 
> > Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]