[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Build KMail only?
From:       Lydia Pintscher <lydia () kde ! org>
Date:       2011-07-10 16:58:42
Message-ID: CAFkLwpUOjeYmYO52AhxQrDoOncAAn1X_mrR-K1zoCs+dO5cGHg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:20, Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 04:34 PM, Tom Albers wrote:
> > Calling technology of fellow community members cruft is very disrespectful. I \
> > suggest you read the CoC:http://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/ 
> > Best,
> 
> The definition of "cruft" is "anything unpleasant that accumulates over
> time".  This discussion is about the problems that Akonadi and other
> dependencies represent to those who wish to port KMail to other
> platforms.  Akonadi may have it's value, which isn't disputed here, but
> you have to agree that in this case it represents an unpleasant addition
> to KMail.  Therefore, it is only possible to interpret the use of this
> expression of this particular term as being very disrespectful if you
> interpret any reference to any problem that it may cause to anyone as
> being very disrespectful.  And that isn't true.

There are different ways of talking about problems. Let's try to use
the more constructive ones here, please?


Cheers
Lydia

-- 
Lydia Pintscher
KDE Community Working Group member
http://kde.org - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
 
> > Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]