From kde-devel Sun Jul 10 16:35:27 2011 From: Tom Albers Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:35:27 +0000 To: kde-devel Subject: Re: Build KMail only? Message-Id: X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=131031578907868 ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- > On 07/10/2011 04:34 PM, Tom Albers wrote: > > Calling technology of fellow community members cruft is very > > disrespectful. I suggest you read the > > CoC:http://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/ > > > > Best, > > The definition of "cruft" is "anything unpleasant that accumulates > over > time". This discussion is about the problems that Akonadi and other > dependencies represent to those who wish to port KMail to other > platforms. Akonadi may have it's value, which isn't disputed here, > but > you have to agree that in this case it represents an unpleasant > addition > to KMail. Therefore, it is only possible to interpret the use of > this > expression of this particular term as being very disrespectful if you > interpret any reference to any problem that it may cause to anyone as > being very disrespectful. And that isn't true. You can talk all you want, you called akonadi and friends 'cruft' and I find that disrespectful and unneeded, you could have conveyed exactly the same message without the addition of the word 'cruft'. -- Tom Albers >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<