[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Some questions regarding development for KDE3
From:       Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad () users ! sourceforge ! net>
Date:       2007-01-18 23:15:49
Message-ID: eoov36$bu0$1 () sea ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

(KDevelop fokls: this is talking about navigation, i.e. 'go to 
<function>' in the context menu.)

Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 18.01.07 23:34:44, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
>> OK. A suggestion though, better strip the whole method signature, it's only 
>> useful for overloaded methods which doesn't happen that often in practice, 
>> and the rest of the times it's just clutter.
> 
> Hmm, ever looked at Qt recently? I see plenty of overloads there ;) An
> option to do this may be an option ;)

...or maybe only do it for C++ sources? This actually irritates me as 
well (not a lot, just a bit), especially as function names in some 
projects tend to have long arguments lists. In C when there can only 
ever be one version of a function, the argument list can be a bit 
overkill. :-)

-- 
Matthew
"What a wonderful smell you've discovered!" -- Princess Leia Organa

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]