[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: Re: Enhancing lan:/ and rlan:/
From: Alexander Neundorf <neundorf () kde ! org>
Date: 2003-06-22 18:21:46
[Download RAW message or body]
On Saturday 21 June 2003 19:28, Jens Benecke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've discussed parts of the following suggestions in the BTS already.
> (http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58835) I would like lan:/ to bring
> more consistency into the KDE desktop, especially regarding display of
> remote hosts within KDE.
>
> In short, I would like three things to happen - and I'm perfectly
> willing to participate in making them happen. :-)
>
>
> - Make lan:/ more verbose, better for non-technical users ("what is this
> SMB folder? I just want to copy a file from the other computer!")
>
> A (fake) screenshot that shows what I thought about of is at
> http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=1646&action=view
>
> It doesn't have to look exactly like that, it's just an idea. :)
>
>
> - Everytime you manually connect to a host via a 'file-like' protocol
> that lisa knows*, _add_ this host to the list of hosts displayed in
> the lan:/ protocol. This solves three problems:
Good idea, but it has a problem: lisa scans (or gets the scanned list)
according to /etc/lisarc. This one is systemwide. It can't be changed if one
user visits another host.
So I would have to implement it in the kio_lan ioslave. The pinging isn't a
good idea, since this would require root privileges for the ioslave.
Another way would be if a user visits fish://somehost, the lan-ioslave (damn,
how should the information from the fish-ioslave get to the lan-ioslave ?)
could remember the service (here: ssh) and then, if it is about to ask lisa
for the hosts, also check the ssh-port if "somehost", i.e. no pinging.
This could work.
The one thing I don't know is how the information about visiting "somehost"
via fish should get to the lan-ioslave.
And, which hosts should be remembered ? fish, ftp ?
> + one can let the host stay inside lan:/ for the session, then lisa does
> not need to be changed. If the host entry should be saved, the user must
> either use reslisa, or enter the root password to change lisarc, _or_
> change the lisa protocol, so that lisa can be told to scan new hosts at
> runtime (is that a good idea?).
No, since it is also possible that the lisa-daemon doesn't scan itself, but
gets the information from a "master"-lisa daemon in the network, and all
lisa-daemons in a network should ideally be configured the same way.
BTW, should I rename the binary from "lisa" to "lisad" ?
> I would propse a lan:/ "subfolder" called (maybe) "Other computers",
> which contains _temporary_ entries of all machines that were
> accessed by the above mentioned procotols during the _current_
> session. LISA doesn't need to know about them - we know the user
> accessed a service and it was successful, so there is no need for
> the host to be re-scanned.
Well, but we don't know whether the host is still up later on.
If somebody has an idea about the mentioned problem I'll have a look at it ...
(but be patient)
Bye
Alex
--
Work: alexander.neundorf@jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: neundorf@kde.org - http://www.kde.org
alex@neundorf.net - http://www.neundorf.net
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic