[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: KSpread: Value's implicitly sharing
From: "Ariya Hidayat" <ariya () kde ! org>
Date: 2007-01-12 17:28:18
Message-ID: ba035dd10701120928u358ba49esbe75b2bcfa40d098 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
> is there a reason why Value does not use the implicitly sharing offered by Qt?
Because I created this long long time ago, before the existence of
QSharedData(Pointer).
> I remember one bug (zeros all over), that was caused by a missing detaching
> of the data. I'd prefer Qt's built-in way, as it pulls the whole logic behind
> the scenes and opens the door for multi-threading.
> Should it be converted or should it stay as is until multi-threading takes
> place? Or is there any other good reason for the one or the other?
I vote for conversion. But don't ask me to do the conversion :-)
Regards,
Ariya
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic