[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    KSpread: Value's implicitly sharing
From:       Stefan Nikolaus <stefan.nikolaus () kdemail ! net>
Date:       2007-01-12 16:58:37
Message-ID: 200701121758.40830.stefan.nikolaus () kdemail ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Hi,

is there a reason why Value does not use the implicitly sharing offered by Qt? 
I remember one bug (zeros all over), that was caused by a missing detaching 
of the data. I'd prefer Qt's built-in way, as it pulls the whole logic behind 
the scenes and opens the door for multi-threading.

Should it be converted or should it stay as is until multi-threading takes 
place? Or is there any other good reason for the one or the other?

Regards,
Stefan

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]