From koffice-devel Fri Jan 12 17:28:18 2007 From: "Ariya Hidayat" Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:28:18 +0000 To: koffice-devel Subject: Re: KSpread: Value's implicitly sharing Message-Id: X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=116862290821081 > is there a reason why Value does not use the implicitly sharing offered by Qt? Because I created this long long time ago, before the existence of QSharedData(Pointer). > I remember one bug (zeros all over), that was caused by a missing detaching > of the data. I'd prefer Qt's built-in way, as it pulls the whole logic behind > the scenes and opens the door for multi-threading. > Should it be converted or should it stay as is until multi-threading takes > place? Or is there any other good reason for the one or the other? I vote for conversion. But don't ask me to do the conversion :-) Regards, Ariya _______________________________________________ koffice-devel mailing list koffice-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel