> is there a reason why Value does not use the implicitly sharing offered by Qt?

Because I created this long long time ago, before the existence of
QSharedData(Pointer).

> I remember one bug (zeros all over), that was caused by a missing detaching
> of the data. I'd prefer Qt's built-in way, as it pulls the whole logic behind
> the scenes and opens the door for multi-threading.

> Should it be converted or should it stay as is until multi-threading takes
> place? Or is there any other good reason for the one or the other?

I vote for conversion. But don't ask me to do the conversion :-)



Regards,

Ariya
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel