[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-licensing
Subject:    Re: What is the license of oxygen icons? [POSSIBLE LICENSE VIOLATION]
From:       Matthew Woehlke <matthew.woehlke () kitware ! com>
Date:       2014-05-09 16:12:55
Message-ID: 536CFE87.3070105 () users ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

(@Nuno, please see quoted message)

On 2014-05-08 18:22, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dijous, 8 de maig de 2014, a les 16:56:24, Matthew Woehlke va escriure:
>> oxygen-icons.org seems to have disappeared, making it harder to know a
>> definitive answer.
>>
>> I'm trying to determine what is the actual licensing of the oxygen
>> icons, in connection to possible violations thereof. Specifically,
>> http://openiconlibrary.sourceforge.net/ claims they are dual-licensed as
>> CC-BY-SA 3.0, but I am unable to confirm this claim, and Wikipedia,
>> Fedora and http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Oxygen/Licensing all claim
>> that they are licensed *only* under LGPL. (Additionally, COPYING in the
>> tarballs only gives LGPL.)
>>
>> Is there any truth to the CC-BY-SA claim? If not, is there someone to
>> whom I should be reporting this violation?
>>
>> (It's worse than just openiconlibrary; who knows how many users are
>> using the icons in violation of LGPL...)
>
> You may want to mail Nuno and some of the other guys? They probably know which
> license they choose?

Sorry, I've been out of the loop too long; which "other guys" would you 
suggest?

-- 
Matthew
_______________________________________________
Kde-licensing mailing list
Kde-licensing@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-licensing
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]