[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-licensing
Subject:    Re: What is the license of oxygen icons? [POSSIBLE LICENSE VIOLATION]
From:       Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date:       2014-05-08 22:22:42
Message-ID: 11570652.DpGV4rMD5m () xps
[Download RAW message or body]

El Dijous, 8 de maig de 2014, a les 16:56:24, Matthew Woehlke va escriure:
> oxygen-icons.org seems to have disappeared, making it harder to know a
> definitive answer.
> 
> I'm trying to determine what is the actual licensing of the oxygen
> icons, in connection to possible violations thereof. Specifically,
> http://openiconlibrary.sourceforge.net/ claims they are dual-licensed as
> CC-BY-SA 3.0, but I am unable to confirm this claim, and Wikipedia,
> Fedora and http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Oxygen/Licensing all claim
> that they are licensed *only* under LGPL. (Additionally, COPYING in the
> tarballs only gives LGPL.)
> 
> Is there any truth to the CC-BY-SA claim? If not, is there someone to
> whom I should be reporting this violation?
> 
> (It's worse than just openiconlibrary; who knows how many users are
> using the icons in violation of LGPL...)

You may want to mail Nuno and some of the other guys? They probably know which 
license they choose?

Cheers,
  Albert
_______________________________________________
Kde-licensing mailing list
Kde-licensing@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-licensing
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]