[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    Bug#37708: unknown fields appearing in emails.
From:       colin.taylor () btclick ! com
Date:       2002-01-31 18:35:54
[Download RAW message or body]

Package: kmail
Version: 1.3.2 (using KDE 2.2.2 )
Severity: normal
Installed from:    Compiled From Sources
Compiler:          gvv version 2.96 20000731
OS:                Linux
OS/Compiler notes: Linux Mandrake 8.0 2.96-0.48mdk

I have some emails that appear with "No Subject" in the Subject field, "Unknown" in \
the Sender field and "unknown" in the date field. Sometimes I get part of a subject \
and sometimes I get a Sender, but not always. When I view the file after "Save as", I \
can see corrupt headers. Example 1:
From  

Example 2:
From dan@scannelluk.com 
Return-Path: <owner-leicester-colin.taylor=btclick.com@lists.lug.org.uk>
Received: from btclick.com ([10.216.84.151]) by
          mss01pvt.fusion.bt.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.05) with
          ESMTP id GOSUAC00.S3N for <colin.taylor@btclick.com>; Sun, 23
          Dec 2001 13:47:00 +0000 
Received: from lug.org.uk ([195.92.249.253]) by btclick.com
          (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GOSUAB01.UQG for
          <colin.taylor@btclick.com>; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 13:46:59 +0000 
Received: (qmail 21265 invoked by uid 300); 23 Dec 2001 13:46:59 -0000
Delivered-To: leicester@lists.lug.org.uk
Received: (qmail 21259 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2001 13:46:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO io.scannelluk.com) (212.43.182.77)
  by lug.org.uk with SMTP; 23 Dec 2001 13:46:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 28307 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2001 14:49:23 -0000
Received: from pb8s08a07.client.global.net.uk (HELO pluto) (195.147.232.185)
  by 212.43.182.77 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2001 14:49:23 -0000
Message-ID: <002401c18bb7$4627bd10$b9e893c3@pluto>
From: "Dan Scannell" <dan@scannelluk.com>
To: <leicester@lists.lug.org.uk>
References: <20011220170612.ACFDD291693@tux-it.co.uk> \
<000701c18b36$8642bca0$269593c3@pluto> <01122310245900.12759@linux> \
<20011223115441.M26302@metastasis.demon.co.uk> <000b01c18ba8$1b7d07f0$c79793c3@pluto> \
                <20011223124053.N26302@metastasis.demon.co.uk>
Subject: [leicest
Content-Type: 
Status: RO
X-Status: O

er] Decent Co Location
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 13:39:40 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Sender: owner-leicester@lists.lug.org.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leicester@lists.lug.org.uk

Hi,

I think Im going to settle on either

http://www.serverhoster.co.uk/

or

http://www.dedicated-servers.co.uk
Do these do IP throttling?

Thanks,

Dan


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Try our wiki http://www.leicester.lug.org.uk/cgi-bin/wiki.pl
--------------------------------------------------------------------


Example 3:
From rob_davies@ntlworld.com 
Return-Path: <owner-leicester-colin.taylor=btclick.com@lists.lug.org.uk>
Received: from btclick.com ([10.216.84.151]) by
          mss01pvt.fusion.bt.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.05) with
          ESMTP id GOL2E500.103 for <colin.taylor@btclick.com>; Wed, 19
          Dec 2001 09:01:17 +0000 
Received: from lug.org.uk ([195.92.249.253]) by btclick.com
          (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GOL2E501.QBO for
          <colin.taylor@btclick.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 09:01:17 +0000 
Received: (qmail 20015 invoked by uid 300); 19 Dec 2001 09:01:16 -0000
Delivered-To: leicester@lists.lug.org.uk
Received: (qmail 20009 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2001 09:01:16 -0000
Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (62.253.162.47)
  by lug.org.uk with SMTP; 19 Dec 2001 09:01:16 -0000
Received: from linux.local ([213.105.14.68]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.23 201-229-121-123-20010418) with ESMTP
          id <20011219090115.YWIS10846.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@linux.local>
          for <leicester@lists.lug.org.uk>; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 09:01:15 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
	by linux.local (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id fBJ8x6v01400
	for leicester@lists.lug.org.uk; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:59:06 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Robert Davies <rob_davies@ntlworld.com>
To: leicester@lists.lug.org.uk
Status: RO
X-Status: O

S
ubject: Re: [leicester] shell hackery
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:59:06 +0000
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <3C1F2F35.00BF0A.00525@baldrick.anytimenow.com> \
                <20011218145247.A173@metastasis.demon.co.uk> \
                <3C1F597A.D66048D4@mesias.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3C1F597A.D66048D4@mesias.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01121908590601.01241@linux>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-leicester@lists.lug.org.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leicester@lists.lug.org.uk

On Tuesday 18 December 2001 14:58, you wrote:

> It's filename expansion. The comma separated values are added on to
> the bit in front, to make a list of files, more often seen as:

> To see the effect of mv filename{,old} (or other shell hackery) put
> an echo in front like this:

Ta' what an excellent explanation!  I'd add that it comes from the C shell, 
and that {,.c,.h,.o} is expanded by the shell (bash,tcsh,zsh), it maintains 
both the ordering specified and the files don't have to be there, so I use it 
rather a lot.

Rob
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Try our wiki http://www.leicester.lug.org.uk/cgi-bin/wiki.pl
--------------------------------------------------------------------


If you need any more info. then please don't hesitate to contact me.

(Submitted via bugs.kde.org)


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]