Package: kmail Version: 1.3.2 (using KDE 2.2.2 ) Severity: normal Installed from: Compiled From Sources Compiler: gvv version 2.96 20000731 OS: Linux OS/Compiler notes: Linux Mandrake 8.0 2.96-0.48mdk I have some emails that appear with "No Subject" in the Subject field, "Unknown" in the Sender field and "unknown" in the date field. Sometimes I get part of a subject and sometimes I get a Sender, but not always. When I view the file after "Save as", I can see corrupt headers. Example 1: From Example 2: From dan@scannelluk.com Return-Path: Received: from btclick.com ([10.216.84.151]) by mss01pvt.fusion.bt.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.05) with ESMTP id GOSUAC00.S3N for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 13:47:00 +0000 Received: from lug.org.uk ([195.92.249.253]) by btclick.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GOSUAB01.UQG for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 13:46:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 21265 invoked by uid 300); 23 Dec 2001 13:46:59 -0000 Delivered-To: leicester@lists.lug.org.uk Received: (qmail 21259 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2001 13:46:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO io.scannelluk.com) (212.43.182.77) by lug.org.uk with SMTP; 23 Dec 2001 13:46:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 28307 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2001 14:49:23 -0000 Received: from pb8s08a07.client.global.net.uk (HELO pluto) (195.147.232.185) by 212.43.182.77 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2001 14:49:23 -0000 Message-ID: <002401c18bb7$4627bd10$b9e893c3@pluto> From: "Dan Scannell" To: References: <20011220170612.ACFDD291693@tux-it.co.uk> <000701c18b36$8642bca0$269593c3@pluto> <01122310245900.12759@linux> <20011223115441.M26302@metastasis.demon.co.uk> <000b01c18ba8$1b7d07f0$c79793c3@pluto> <20011223124053.N26302@metastasis.demon.co.uk> Subject: [leicest Content-Type: Status: RO X-Status: O er] Decent Co Location Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 13:39:40 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-leicester@lists.lug.org.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: leicester@lists.lug.org.uk Hi, I think Im going to settle on either http://www.serverhoster.co.uk/ or http://www.dedicated-servers.co.uk Do these do IP throttling? Thanks, Dan -------------------------------------------------------------------- Try our wiki http://www.leicester.lug.org.uk/cgi-bin/wiki.pl -------------------------------------------------------------------- Example 3: From rob_davies@ntlworld.com Return-Path: Received: from btclick.com ([10.216.84.151]) by mss01pvt.fusion.bt.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.05) with ESMTP id GOL2E500.103 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 09:01:17 +0000 Received: from lug.org.uk ([195.92.249.253]) by btclick.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GOL2E501.QBO for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 09:01:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 20015 invoked by uid 300); 19 Dec 2001 09:01:16 -0000 Delivered-To: leicester@lists.lug.org.uk Received: (qmail 20009 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2001 09:01:16 -0000 Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (62.253.162.47) by lug.org.uk with SMTP; 19 Dec 2001 09:01:16 -0000 Received: from linux.local ([213.105.14.68]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.23 201-229-121-123-20010418) with ESMTP id <20011219090115.YWIS10846.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@linux.local> for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 09:01:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by linux.local (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id fBJ8x6v01400 for leicester@lists.lug.org.uk; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:59:06 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Robert Davies To: leicester@lists.lug.org.uk Status: RO X-Status: O S ubject: Re: [leicester] shell hackery Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:59:06 +0000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <3C1F2F35.00BF0A.00525@baldrick.anytimenow.com> <20011218145247.A173@metastasis.demon.co.uk> <3C1F597A.D66048D4@mesias.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <3C1F597A.D66048D4@mesias.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01121908590601.01241@linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-leicester@lists.lug.org.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: leicester@lists.lug.org.uk On Tuesday 18 December 2001 14:58, you wrote: > It's filename expansion. The comma separated values are added on to > the bit in front, to make a list of files, more often seen as: > To see the effect of mv filename{,old} (or other shell hackery) put > an echo in front like this: Ta' what an excellent explanation! I'd add that it comes from the C shell, and that {,.c,.h,.o} is expanded by the shell (bash,tcsh,zsh), it maintains both the ordering specified and the files don't have to be there, so I use it rather a lot. Rob -------------------------------------------------------------------- Try our wiki http://www.leicester.lug.org.uk/cgi-bin/wiki.pl -------------------------------------------------------------------- If you need any more info. then please don't hesitate to contact me. (Submitted via bugs.kde.org)