[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       struts-dev
Subject:    RE: Struts-faces
From:       "Matthias Wessendorf" <mailings () matthias-wessendorf ! de>
Date:       2004-07-06 6:27:59
Message-ID: 001901c46322$62213d80$6402a8c0 () fumakilla
[Download RAW message or body]

> In principle, this makes perfect sense.  It'll be easy if 
> you've split 
> the MyFaces jars into api and impl classes (like the RI 
> does), because 
> then it's just a matter of setting up your own 
> build.properties file and 
> defining "jsf-api.jar" and "jsf-impl.jar" appropriately.

no, not now. but i mean also the use of myfaces
in the examples. so it would be much easier
for users, since JSF (myfaces) is delivered directly

for running the WAR-files.


matthias


> I'll look into seeing if that actually works, once I've caught up and 
> made sure that struts-faces works with the current version of the RI 
> (the code I'm most familiar with).  But that has to wait until I do 
> penance for being offline for a couple of months, by taking a 
> whack at 
> our failing cookie-related Cactus tests :-).
> 
> >cheers,
> >matthias
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> Craig
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:56:41 -0700, Craig McClanahan
> >><craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Ted Husted wrote:
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>make sure
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>it stays in synch with Tomcat 5.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>It is indeed, but that's actually a mistake.  It needs to compile
> >>>against the 2.3 version, since that's what JSF specifies as 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>a minimum
> >>    
> >>
> >>>platform.  I'll fix that in tonight's run.
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>But, the question is whether we want to mandate that
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>Struts-Faces can
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>only compile against 2.3 (and not 2.4)? Or vice-versa. Or
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>is there a
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>way to write the class so it compiles under either?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>I'll take a look at the changes once I catch up a little
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>bit more, and
> >>    
> >>
> >>>might be able to come up with something clever that makes this
> >>>possible (still recovering from JavaOne and ~11k backlogged mail 
> >>>messages :-).
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>I know this is a pain. We went through the same problem with
> >>>>DataSources between 2.2 and 2.3. I'm not sure what the 
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>issue here is,
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>but for DataSources, the interface changed and we had to
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>stub the new
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>members so that they threw exceptions if called. Of course, the
> >>>>problem with that approach is it may obviate new functionality or 
> >>>>rely on deprecated methods.
> >>>>
> >>>>-Ted.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>Craig
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:14:02 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>James,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>i also guess it is the result of the commitment.
> >>>>>i submitted (first) a wrapper, that builds against 2.4 reason is,
> >>>>>the build-porperties had *default* to 2.4
> >>>>>
> >>>>>okay ted asks for a 2.3-wrapper, so i created that candidate.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>i think the wrapper should compile against 2.3
> >>>>>since jsf is able to run in j2ee1.3-containers
> >>>>>
> >>>>>So i am wondering, why struts-faces uses 2.4
> >>>>>for compiling.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>btw. the 2.3 wrapper runs on servlet2.4-containers (like
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>tomcat5.0)
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>>Matthias
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>I think it is happening because of the changes I
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>committed for your
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>>>fix for MyFaces.  If you look at when the builds stopped, it's
> >>>>>>right after I made the commits on 6/29.  It must be an issue of 
> >>>>>>what version of servlet.jar that the HttpServletRequestWrapper 
> >>>>>>class is being compiled against. Is it not possible to 
> make that 
> >>>>>>class compilable against both 2.3 and 2.4?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>-James
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:mailings@matthias-
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>wessendorf.de]
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>>>Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 6:29 AM To: dev@struts.apache.org
> >>>>>>Subject: Struts-faces
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>see http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-
> >>>>>>faces/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>the nightly build is empty again,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>so is there a logfile, where i can check, why it is not build
> >>>>>>successful?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Cheers,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>--
> >>>>>>Matthias Weßendorf
> >>>>>>Aechterhoek 18
> >>>>>>DE-48282 Emsdetten
> >>>>>>Germany
> >>>>>>Email: matthias AT wessendorf DOT net
> >>>>>>URL: http://www.wessendorf.net
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>---------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>--- To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>>>additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>---------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>--- To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>>>additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>>>----------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> >>>>>additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>-----------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> >>>>additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> >>    
> >>
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For 
> >>>additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic