[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sqlite-users
Subject:    Re: [sqlite] SQLite vs. Oracle (parallelized)
From:       Chris Wedgwood <cw () f00f ! org>
Date:       2009-02-25 18:29:59
Message-ID: 20090225182959.GB647857 () puku ! stupidest ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:28:00PM -0500, D. Richard Hipp wrote:

> Remember: SQLite is not trying to replace Oracle.  SQLite is trying
> to replace fopen().

Exactly.  SQLite is *wonderful* for this, and I would hate to see it
compromised by adding features that really aren't necessary.

There are a lot of feature requests, and many of them are to make
SQLite more like MySQL or Oracle --- in which case I would suggest
people really should be using those.

I'm very happy with how small, compact, and blisteringly fast, SQLite
is for a whole range of uses, I don't want it bloated down to make it
something it's not.

Oh, except right joins.  If you add those I won't mind :-)
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]