[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       quanta-devel
Subject:    Re: [quanta-devel] kdevquanta
From:       Paulo Moura Guedes <moura () kdewebdev ! org>
Date:       2005-11-13 16:24:10
Message-ID: 200511131624.11433.moura () kdewebdev ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 13 November 2005 14:58, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Sunday 13 November 2005 15:53, thorsten@staerk.de wrote:
> > I checked out kdevquanta this weekend - very good approach, only a
> > wysiwyg editor is missing. I would like to help writing one -
> > however, it is unrealistic I can do this quickly enough on my own.
> > Are there plans ?
>
> Yes. The VPL part was not ported by purpose as the plans are more
> complex regarding this area. The plans are is to modify the current
> parser that instead of its own node tree it will build a KDOM based
> node tree. There is ongoing work for KHTML to be ported to KDOM as
> well. This will make possible to share the node tree between Quanta and
> KHTML. Right now there are two completely independent trees that are
> needed to be synchronized often in both ways. I'm not that familiar
> with the VPL code, but as the developers said, this is the main reason
> why it is unstable, slow and hard to develop. Everybody is waiting for
> the KDOM tree in Quanta. ;-) The problem is that nobody, except me
> wants to touch the parser, and even I approach with much care as it can
> break lots of things. So we started to port those parts that are not
> related to VPL and a new parser (basicly everything else).
>  But we sooner than later we must port VPL as well.

Well said ;)
_______________________________________________
quanta-devel mailing list
quanta-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]