From quanta-devel Sun Nov 13 16:24:10 2005 From: Paulo Moura Guedes Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:24:10 +0000 To: quanta-devel Subject: Re: [quanta-devel] kdevquanta Message-Id: <200511131624.11433.moura () kdewebdev ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=quanta-devel&m=113189903627311 On Sunday 13 November 2005 14:58, Andras Mantia wrote: > On Sunday 13 November 2005 15:53, thorsten@staerk.de wrote: > > I checked out kdevquanta this weekend - very good approach, only a > > wysiwyg editor is missing. I would like to help writing one - > > however, it is unrealistic I can do this quickly enough on my own. > > Are there plans ? > > Yes. The VPL part was not ported by purpose as the plans are more > complex regarding this area. The plans are is to modify the current > parser that instead of its own node tree it will build a KDOM based > node tree. There is ongoing work for KHTML to be ported to KDOM as > well. This will make possible to share the node tree between Quanta and > KHTML. Right now there are two completely independent trees that are > needed to be synchronized often in both ways. I'm not that familiar > with the VPL code, but as the developers said, this is the main reason > why it is unstable, slow and hard to develop. Everybody is waiting for > the KDOM tree in Quanta. ;-) The problem is that nobody, except me > wants to touch the parser, and even I approach with much care as it can > break lots of things. So we started to port those parts that are not > related to VPL and a new parser (basicly everything else). > But we sooner than later we must port VPL as well. Well said ;) _______________________________________________ quanta-devel mailing list quanta-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta-devel