[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kwrite-devel
Subject:    Re: qt4.xml -> qt.xml
From:       Alex Turbov <i.zaufi () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-02-23 11:06:12
Message-ID: CANktQttmPBd3kzCdZ_jBk4aTdxA5WevnLBjRYPp1EHwOHBmZ6w () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Andrey Matveyakin
<a.matveyakin@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I agree with Milian and Sven. There is no big syntactic difference between
> Qt4 and Qt5.
>

this is not a matter of _syntacic_ difference (in this case)... it is about
being helpful editor (as a primary goal of kate).
if I see smth gets highlighted I don't want to think is it really available
(or I just recall it incorrectly, and it is not a part of Qt anymore)...


> Many programs cannot be even classified as Qt4- or Qt5-applications. For
> example, in a project I work on now, we have several ifdef's to make
> program compile and work nicely both with Qt4 and Qt5.
>

so address that king of projects I suppose qt5 syntax should contain
qt4-only classes as highlighted deprecated (just different)...
so it can helps to port some apps to qt5, and ppl writing bi-qt stuff may
just use same color for qt4/5 features...


>
> And yes, IMO it is really troublesome to have separate highlight files for
> C++03, C++11, C++14, C++03/Qt4, C++11/Qt4, C++14/Qt4, C++03/Qt5, C++11/Qt5,
> C++14/Qt5.
>


>
> Not sure if we should go beyond just C++ and C++/Qt variants.
>
>
I see no reason as well

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 23, \
2014 at 2:43 PM, Andrey Matveyakin <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:a.matveyakin@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">a.matveyakin@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br> <blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi,<br><br>I agree with Milian and Sven. There \
is no big syntactic difference between Qt4 and Qt5. </div> \
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>this is not a matter of _syntacic_ difference (in \
this case)... it is about being helpful editor (as a primary goal of \
kate).<br></div><div>if I see smth gets highlighted I don&#39;t want to think is it \
really available (or I just recall it incorrectly, and it is not a part of Qt \
anymore)...<br> </div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 \
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Many programs cannot \
be even classified as Qt4- or Qt5-applications. For example, in a project I work on \
now, we have several ifdef&#39;s to make program compile and work nicely both with \
Qt4 and Qt5.<br> </div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>so address that king of \
projects I suppose qt5 syntax should contain qt4-only classes as highlighted \
deprecated (just different)...<br></div><div>so it can helps to port some apps to \
qt5, and ppl writing bi-qt stuff may just use same color for qt4/5 features...<br>  \
<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"> <br>And yes, IMO it is really \
troublesome to have separate highlight files for C++03, C++11, C++14, C++03/Qt4, \
C++11/Qt4, C++14/Qt4, C++03/Qt5, C++11/Qt5, C++14/Qt5.<br></div></blockquote><div> \
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div dir="ltr"><br>Not sure if we should go beyond just C++ \
and C++/Qt variants.<br> </div><br></blockquote></div><br></div><div \
class="gmail_extra">I see no reason as well<br><br></div></div>



_______________________________________________
KWrite-Devel mailing list
KWrite-Devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwrite-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]