[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Adding names to implicit framesets in kword
From:       David Faure <david () mandrakesoft ! com>
Date:       2001-06-02 8:48:06
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 02 June 2001 03:00, shaheed wrote:
> > > As for "<FORMAT id="2"><IMAGE> " going away, I have to think abut that.
> >
> > So you're using it, as opposed to a picture frameset ?
> > We can keep it, but I'd be surprised that we really need it.
> 
> I *was* using this, but would like to move to framesets as you suggested. 
> However, there is a feature supported by PIXMAPs which we will loose...

I don't understand. We'd keep <PIXMAP> in any case.
A picture frameset has an <IMAGE> tag, which has a key, that refers to an entry
in the PIXMAP collection....

> Agreed about the "copy" in the header footer case. But the real point is that 
> if you are intending to remove PIXMAPs, 

I don't want to remove PIXMAP. Only FORMAT id="2".

> then this ability to elide multiple 
> instances of an image into a single stored instance will be lost, since this 
> concept is not natural to framesets.

You can still have framesets pointing to the same image by name.

-- 
David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://perso.mandrakesoft.com/~david/, http://www.konqueror.org/
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today
_______________________________________________
Koffice-devel mailing list
Koffice-devel@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]