[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: KOffice split
From:       Anne Wilson <cannewilson () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2010-10-28 8:24:19
Message-ID: 201010280924.20114.cannewilson () googlemail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Wednesday 27 Oct 2010 17:22:58 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Well I leave what I wrote for considering of the community members,
> those not initially involved in the hard decision of splitting.
> Your reply in this thread and in many discussions, as I remember,
> shows possible source of nasty issues. This includes claiming that the
> discussion goes off topic or requesting for re-reading. Let's re-read
> again then: you refer to FOCUS 7 times in your original post. And to
> PRIORITIES 9 times. This is not a minor reference in my logic. I am
> afraid we do not even have agreement about _what's your post about_,
> so I am sorry but further dialogue is not very useful.

The constant harping on problems, particularly of the past, are not helping at 
all (this is not directed at one person, but to the whole group).  Please 
confine your replies to positive suggestions that may help the future of 
KOffice, in whatever form it develops.

Anne
-- 
KDE Community Working Group
New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]