[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Meeting decisions
From:       Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date:       2007-10-27 16:00:34
Message-ID: 200710271800.34999.zander () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Saturday 27 October 2007 16:47:14 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Here's a short list of decisions we made at the meeting, and where
> applicable, the name of the volunteer

Great list, lots of stuff decided, and lots of stuff to do :)

I really like just about all of the things you found, so even while I'm sad 
to not be able to be in Berlin myself, I happy with the goings on.

I have just two things that I found surprising;
>  We need a good shape selector, though, the current one doesn't cut
Does this mean that in your (collective) opinion it is not release ready 
for 2.0?  If so, what is wrong/missing?
I'd be happy to look into things that people consider show stoppers.

> 27.10.2007-15:27  psn: we're discussing connections and considering
> making it a specialized path shape
> 27.10.2007-15:29 < psn> boud: never had anything against it being a
> shape... that was ThomasZ and someone else... actually I'd prefer it to
> be as there will be less duplication of code then   
> 27.10.2007-15:29  psn: good, that's our conclusion, too. 

We had this discussion before, and on my question back then what actually 
the connection and shape share, the list of things stayed awfully small.
I really can only think of one thing; they are both painted on screen.

I recally suggesting back then to make a connection have a path-shape as a 
(private) member to paint the connection with.

Maybe I'm missing something, and I'd love to hear it (as I wrote all the 
connection stuff, I feel like I'm the maintainer, so I'd appreciate 
staying in the loop on big rewrites).

So, what kind of code do you guys want to share?  I mean; a connection 
doesn't even have a position like a shape does, and just about all 
shape-related code is thus useless.
I'm confused...

Anyway, again, great work; and I hope we can see loads and loads of commits 
soon ;)
-- 
Thomas Zander

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]