[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Notes on koffice unit tests
From:       Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date:       2007-02-12 12:43:45
Message-ID: 200702121343.46069.zander () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Monday 12 February 2007 12:48, Jan Hambrecht wrote:
> Yes i prefer that too, but again that would break the z-order painting.
In complex hierarchies, you are probably right...

> And what is with the shape containers z-index?
If the children are nested shapes, then they inherit the z-index from their 
parent. And the z-index of all children is used to figure out the painting 
order of the children (on top of the parent).
This concept is inherited from how we did things from KWord 1.1 forward.

> As long as the the z-index works document wide and can be abitrary set,
> there are cases with unclear rendering order.
> Or do i miss something?

No, thats true.
But if two objects don't overlap then the rendering order can be switched 
without any problem.

All in all, my points in this thread are just my opinions for the current 
code. Which is broken. Its clear you got a good grasp of the stuff, so if you 
find the time to implement any solution, I'd be happy.
-- 
Thomas Zander

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]