[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Notes on koffice unit tests
From:       Jan Hambrecht <jaham () gmx ! net>
Date:       2007-02-12 12:54:04
Message-ID: 45D0636C.6040808 () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Monday 12 February 2007 12:48, Jan Hambrecht wrote:
>> Yes i prefer that too, but again that would break the z-order painting.
> In complex hierarchies, you are probably right...
> 
>> And what is with the shape containers z-index?
> If the children are nested shapes, then they inherit the z-index from their 
> parent. And the z-index of all children is used to figure out the painting 
> order of the children (on top of the parent).
> This concept is inherited from how we did things from KWord 1.1 forward.

Ah, that makes sense.

> 
>> As long as the the z-index works document wide and can be abitrary set,
>> there are cases with unclear rendering order.
>> Or do i miss something?
> 
> No, thats true.
> But if two objects don't overlap then the rendering order can be switched 
> without any problem.

Yes true.

> 
> All in all, my points in this thread are just my opinions for the current 
> code. Which is broken. Its clear you got a good grasp of the stuff, so if you 
> find the time to implement any solution, I'd be happy.

Ok is see if i can work something out during this week. Starting from 
next monday i will be on a holiday trip for two weeks. So if i do not 
get something working until friday, it has to wait a little longer.

Ciao Jan


_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]