[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: A simple place for complex settings, KOffice-wide
From:       Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date:       2007-01-09 21:26:32
Message-ID: 200701092226.32765.zander () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tuesday 09 January 2007 22:11, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Thomas Zander said the following, On 2007-01-09 21:54:
> > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 19:49, Jarosław Staniek wrote:
> >> If that's ok to you, it will be no problem to reuse the dialog in other
> >> KOffice apps once it is present in Kexi 2.0 sometime this year.
> >
> > This is not something I want to see in at least KWord, and I'd feel bad
> > if it were in other KOffice applications.
> >
> > As I stated before; the koproperty library is something that is not
> > usable for the target audience of KOffice.
>
> Whether it's implemented using koproperty or WINAPI or Flake or
> FooBarMetaProgramming, it does not matter, the proposal is about
> functionality so do not use the points from a different thread.

Ehm, no. You didn't ask if we thought we had too many options. You didn't 
refer to any research that this option indeed is used by such a small amount 
of people that it can be hidden. You didn't make a point at how KOffice 
configuration really is over the top.
All you did was state that you thought this config option was a great reason 
to build a config dialog like you linked to. Preferably based on 
koproperties.

And thats what I commented on.

I don't like it.
-- 
Thomas Zander

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]