[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Registries
From:       Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date:       2006-06-09 21:26:59
Message-ID: 200606092327.00154.zander () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday 9 June 2006 22:41, David Faure wrote:
> > With this we cut out the kparts class.
>
> No no. Argh. This makes no sense ;)
> All this over a confusing namespace? ;)
> What matters is what's in the link line of your plugins, not the name
> of the loading method.

Namespace? Link line?  No idea what thats all about.
Hmm, I'll immediately admit I don't understand this loading stuff, it 
would be great if there actually was some API docs :-)

> Benchmark if you wish, but from experience I'm quite sure that loading
> 100 plugins or not loading them makes a huge difference.

100? If its more then 20, I'd be surprised.  Only Krita is heavy on 
plugins.

-- 
Thomas Zander

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]