[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: Developer manual for KOffice
From: Inge Wallin <inge () lysator ! liu ! se>
Date: 2005-10-26 11:42:24
Message-ID: 200510261342.24888.inge () lysator ! liu ! se
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 12.27, Raphael Langerhorst wrote:
> Inge wrote:
> > But on the other hand, we might need a developer manual for KOffice
> > (separated from the user manual). I didn't think that we would need it
> > until we introduced scripting, but it seems that I was wrong.
>
> Well, there could be two developer manuals - one for the KOffice developers
> themselves, and one for people that use KOffice and develop their own
> add-on stuff (plugins, Scripts, Kugar reports, ...).
I don't think we need a developer manual for the KOffice developers
themselves. Of course, we need documentation, but I don't think that a
docbook manual would be the right way to do it.
On the other hand, if we want to spread KOffice usage, I think that a manual
for people who want to script KOffice would be a very good thing. It's often
a lack of knowledge about already existing features that keep people from
using them. In fact, I think this happens almost as often as the features
not existing at all.
> Still, for now I would like to find out if there is demand for such a
> thing. I was at last able to put a developers handbook together for the G
> System, so I guess the KOffice devbook would look similiar (but of course
> adapted). This approach combines both variants. You can find it here:
> http://www.g-system.at/doc/latest/dochome.html (it's the devbook)
Yes, something like this. When we discussed this on IRC, you had a number of
ideas yourself:
- KOffice scripting with DCOP
- creating custom plugins
- reports with kugar
Kexi is also a natural subject for this, but since Kexi is so much a
developers tool from the beginning, it would be logical to produce a manual
for Kexi alone.
> Do you generally want/require/desire a developers handbook like this? I
> certainly see the benefit especially for new contributors... but also for
> users that extend KOffice for their own needs.
I think it would be good. However, I don't think that the target should be
KOffice core developers. Instead it should be people who want to customize
KOffice for their own needs, but don't want to touch the C++ classes.
-Inge
--
Inge Wallin | Thus spake the master programmer: |
| "After three days without programming, |
inge@lysator.liu.se | life becomes meaningless." |
| Geoffrey James: The Tao of Programming. |
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic