[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Crash bugs in KOffice
From:       Martin Ellis <m.a.ellis () ncl ! ac ! uk>
Date:       2005-10-17 21:43:59
Message-ID: 200510172244.00001.m.a.ellis () ncl ! ac ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 17 Oct 2005 22:38, Alan Horkan wrote:
> The idea wasn't shouted down as impractical but it was pointed out there
> would be extra resources required if filters were to be run in a seperate
> thread.  Without particularly knowing half as much about it as I probalby
> should I'm suggesteing it again and I'll file a bug report if you think it
> is worth considering to help improve stability?

I think we talked about a separate process, not a separate thread. :o)
(A crash in a thread would still crash the whole app)

Alan, I thought you were the one who was worried forking would be too 
expensive?

Personally, I don't think it would be (although, I have no evidence to base 
that opinion that on, what-so-ever).  It's not like I import so frequently 
that performance is a huge issue.

Someone with clue, please advise.

Cheers
Martin
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]