[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: KPresenter maintainership
From:       Thomas Zander <zander () planescape ! com>
Date:       2003-08-29 11:25:41
[Download RAW message or body]

I vote for dropping BC, the amount of applications that use the SpellCheck
outside of koffice is negligable.


On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:31:00AM -0400, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Friday 29 August 2003 05:46, Laurent Montel wrote:
> > -> spell chek is not finished (thanks to Zack to finish it)
> 
> It's at a position where it simply works. Nicely too ;) But there's no 
> way we'll be able to keep BC in it. Currently it's simply impossible. 
> So the big question is:
> 1) Should Zack do everything he can while there's still a little bit of 
> time before the release to give it a chance of staying BC,
> 2) Should Zack leave it simply working and start hacking on changes that 
> would make it possible to keep it BC and have a saner architecture 
> (frontend [dialog] controls the backend [the actual spelling engine] 
> and not the other way round)
> Please let me know because I'm leaving in about 12 hours and I could 
> definitely finish it before I'll land home :)

-- 
Thomas Zander

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]