[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice
Subject:    RE: kformula(s)
From:       David Faure <David.Faure () CRAMER ! CO ! UK>
Date:       1999-09-20 14:16:09
[Download RAW message or body]




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lotzi Boloni [mailto:boloni@cs.purdue.edu]
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 1999 3:05 PM
> To: koffice@max.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de
> Subject: Re: kformula(s)
> 
> 
> > >Does this mean we can get rid of the OpenParts kformula 
> altogether ?
> > 
> > For me it's not a problem.
> > 
> > > (It seems to have more features than libkformula 
> though... (not sure)
> > >  In this case some backporting is necessary first...)
> > 
> > I don't know. I never managed to really use KFormula so I 
> really have no idea.
> 
>   I don't know how efficient is the libkformula based integration but
> please don't make the formula support openparts based. It is really
> horrible in MS Word. If you are frequently using indeces, a two page
> document is already unmanageable, and if you change the formatting you
> have to reformat them all. Formulas are part of the text, they are not
> like embedded spreadsheets and stuff. 
We all know that, that's why Reggie just added libkformula support in KWord.
libkformula is a widget, not an OpenPart part.

--
David Faure
faure@kde.org - KDE developer
david@mandrakesoft.com - Mandrake
david.faure@cramer.co.uk - Cramer Systems

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]