[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice
Subject:    Re: KOffice Lies about requirements and then refuses to accept bug
From:       Markus Heller <markus () relix ! de>
Date:       2006-11-08 18:07:24
Message-ID: 200611081907.24656.markus () relix ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi guys,

This why I love KDE / KOffice. Sorry for my unqualified reply, and that I 
cannot help in this issue. I just needed to say that this kind of 
communication is outstanding and invaluable! Go and try to contact the M$ 
Office development department... ;-) 

David,  Boudewijn, Anne-Marie, and all the others, I honour your work by using 
KOffice on a daily basis. Great job!

Best wishes! 
Markus

> On Wed Nov 8 2006, John McCann wrote:
> > I guess no one bothered to try to build it on 3.3.0 as I believe you
> > need 3.4 at a minium for the setShadeSortColumn
> > koOpenPaneBase.cc: In constructor
> > `KoOpenPaneBase::KoOpenPaneBase(QWidget*, const char*, uint)':
> > koOpenPaneBase.cc:50: error: 'class KListView' has no member named
> > 'setShadeSortColumn'
>
> Damn. I had fixed that error in another file but that one has the same
> problem. You can find the fix attached.
>
> The bugs.kde.org version requirement is a bit of a complicated matter - for
> anything else than koffice (which is released separately), like for
> konqueror, we have to require the latest version of KDE, otherwise we get
> swamped with old useless reports. In fact, if you report a bug with
> koffice-1.6 built on kdelibs-3.3 it works. It's just that in your case you
> couldn't use koffice to report the bug since it wasn't compiled yet.
> Editing the parameters in the URL might have been a way to work around it.

____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]