[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: KIO/KHTML Error Handling Update
From:       Hamish Rodda <meddie () yoyo ! cc ! monash ! edu ! au>
Date:       2002-01-27 19:20:24
[Download RAW message or body]

>On Sunday 27 January 2002 15:42, Hamish Rodda wrote:
>>>On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Hamish Rodda wrote:
>>>> Would you like this for the rest of the message boxes? I would be happy 
>>>> to do it.
>> >
>> >I'm not sure if we need another set of messagebox methods. why can't we
>> > add it as another parameter to the existing ones ?
>
>Because they have enough parameters already, because bools suck in an API,
>because the bool notify makes no sense with queueing (says the comment), and

err, that's my comment, I think I was confusing notification with return 
value, my bad.

>because it's that way now (enough API changes IMHO).
>
>> No problems. I'll add a @deprecated to the existing queuedmessagebox
>> method.
>
>Please don't. Any KMessageBox API change should be run past Waldo, IMHO.

I have sent off an email...

Hamish
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]