[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdepim-users
Subject:    Re: [kdepim-users] Why is KMail so bad with GMail IMAP?
From:       Marc Deop i =?iso-8859-15?q?Argem=ED?= <damnshock () gmail ! com>
Date:       2007-11-25 19:30:48
Message-ID: 200711252030.52476.damnshock () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Sunday 25 November 2007, Thomas Vollmer wrote:
> For me it works (and worked) well over different types of internet
> connections from 64 KBit/s to that what a 100 MBit/s Ethernet makes when
> it is switched into a 2x2,5 Gps backbone.
>

Well, you seem to be one of the few lucky because if seen many complains about 
imap support under kmail :(

> > After a lot of testing, I got to the conclusion that kmail is not
> > usable with an imap server through an internet connection but it does
> > work with my own imap server on my machine ( it works, but even here,
> > not perfectly).
>
> Yes, local IMAP works also.
>

Obviously. My point was to make you all notice that the problem seems to be 
with the connection type and not with the imap protocol itself


> >
> > PS: offline imap is... well, don't really know why there's this option
> >
> > :(
>
>  
> Think again about it. The first requires a online connection to the IMAP
> server to read through the mails. The second holds a local copy from the
> one already fetched. So You can read through them even when you have no
> internet. The question is why there is this diversification.

I know what it is for, but it works so badly that i would say that is a 
testing feature

Damnshock

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
kdepim-users@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]