[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-usability
Subject:    Re: simpler UI for konqy
From:       Leo Savernik <l.savernik () aon ! at>
Date:       2004-01-15 22:11:53
Message-ID: 200401152311.56407.l.savernik () aon ! at
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2004 21:47 schrieb Max O'Shea:
[...]
> options. So Konqueror should have two 'modes' - web browsing, and file
> browsing, and it should behave like a completely different program
[...]

Why should a single program behave like two completely different programs? 
What's the advantage of it? I can tell you a disadvantage: It's a mess to 
maintain. As I already mentionened elsewhere, if there is the need for a 
distinct web browser in KDE, it must be an application of its own. Everything 
else leads to an incoherent patchwork that will make neither side happy.

mfg
	Leo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQFABxAqj5jssenUYTsRAuyNAKCL9r/MmymD59/YR4HjgY3FAFUSLwCdGWzp
+y7+CnOtMhNp1BSj4H+sy6c=
=lKrD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]