[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    Re: private import names
From:       Marco Martin <notmart () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-09-25 10:45:56
Message-ID: 1814560.rbP2KgFJLV () deimos ! diaunet
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 25 September 2013 12:17:52 Sebastian K=FCgler wrote:
> > so something like private.org.kde.plasma.widgetname or
> > .org.kde.private.plasma.widgetname
> =

> The leading . is purposeful?

ah, no ;)

> > the first would take a "private" at the first level, that maybe is not =
too
> > nice, but the nice part is that it would always be
> > private.$widgetpluginname  that has some beauty (and easy filtering) in=
 it
> =

> I'm cool with private at the beginning, I actually don't care too much, as
> long as it's consistent. This has been spooking around my mind since I sh=
ip-
> it'ed Bhushan's Icon port, I just like to get rid of this nagging feeling
> that we have to change something there. And I'm running into the exact sa=
me
> in the systray port.

maybe could make sense asking in kde-core-devel as well, since i would like =

having other kde apps, at leastthe main ones following the scheme as well..

-- =

Marco Martin
_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]