[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-licensing
Subject:    Re: QT Designer _NOT_ under QPL.
From:       Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP () dfo-mpo ! gc ! ca>
Date:       2000-08-19 18:23:58
[Download RAW message or body]


Kevin Forge wrote:

> Right now the following is a paraphrase of Debians position that looks
> bad unless someone can "clarify":
> 
> It's OK to ship kdelibs today but Nobody in Debian gives a rats ass.

Ask whoever is packaging it now outside of Debian.

> It won't be OK to ship QT-2.2 with integrated Designer but we will 
> perform major hacks and possibly circumvent part of the QPL if
> necessary.

It's my interpretation that it would not circumvent part of the
QPL to omit to build one of the binaries.  I'm not the Qt2
packager maintainer for Debian.  Ask him.  If in doubt, I'm sure
he'd ask Troll directly.  Nobody in their right mind would ask
KDE for licensing advice.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]