[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: Some mixing math
From:       Cyrille Berger <cberger () cberger ! net>
Date:       2007-06-16 21:43:41
Message-ID: 200706162343.41791.cberger () cberger ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

> > Bristles would be better done using a seperate paintop that could then
> > use for each of its bristles any type of available paintop (like it is
> > done in the dynamic paintop see
> > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/koffice/krita/plugins/paintops/dynamicbrush/l
> >ib /shapes/kis_bristle_shape.cc?revision=675999&view=markup)
>
> Isn't that really a lot slower than doing the bristles inside a particular
> paintop?
I hardly see while it would ? (it is now, but there are a lot of reason behind 
that which I am working on, including and having paintLine in the paintOp 
would help, and while playing with the freehand tool I noticed a lot of 
problems with our call to dirty rect, we are overprotective).	

> I mean -- yes, dynamic, programmable and everything is fine, but I 
> see a definite place for paintops that do the bristles differently, for
> instance, all on their own.
I wasn't suggesting that the dynamic paint op should be the only way to do 
bristles :) (or paintop) or at least not yet (in photoshop, brushes are 
allways dynamic), it's too experimental for that. But I definitively think 
that having a bristles paintop which call other paintop is the right 
solution.
-- 
Cyrille Berger
_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]