[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: Some mixing math
From:       Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date:       2007-06-16 16:29:26
Message-ID: 200706161829.26204.boud () valdyas ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday 15 June 2007, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Friday 15 June 2007, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > On Friday 15 June 2007, Emanuele Tamponi wrote:
> > > > http://principe.homelinux.net/email.txt
> > > >
> > > > The text of the email is in the previous link. Sorry but it is
> > > > detected as spam!
> > >
> > > Let's see whether I fare better :-)
> >
> > I succeeded! Now I just have to read all that stuff and understand it --
> > it may take until Sunday until I've time to take a long, hard look at it.
> > First blush says, interesting. You don't use bristles, as far as I can
> > see, but it looks very feasible nonetheless.
>
> Bristles would be better done using a seperate paintop that could then use
> for each of its bristles any type of available paintop (like it is done in
> the dynamic paintop see
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/koffice/krita/plugins/paintops/dynamicbrush/lib
>/shapes/kis_bristle_shape.cc?revision=675999&view=markup)

Isn't that really a lot slower than doing the bristles inside a particular 
paintop? I mean -- yes, dynamic, programmable and everything is fine, but I 
see a definite place for paintops that do the bristles differently, for 
instance, all on their own.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]