[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-i18n-doc
Subject: Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime
From: Vishesh Handa <me () vhanda ! in>
Date: 2012-05-17 20:31:14
Message-ID: CAOPTMKAnNksOJz=E7CXLiAaQ+gRM56xfef4q3fWuS3zntcTjQQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Sebastian Trüg <trueg@kde.org> wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 10:08 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk
> > <mailto:nospam@vuorela.dk>> wrote:
> >
> > On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg <trueg@kde.org <mailto:trueg@kde.org>>
> > wrote:
> > > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are
> > the DBus
> > > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are
> > > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces...
> >
> > Great. thanks.
> >
> >
> > Can't we just break binary compatibility for 4.10. Just this once?
> >
> > @Sebastian: Do you really want to have to deprecate the
> > QueryServiceClient as mentioned in [1]? I rather not have stuff like
> > that lying around in Nepomuk2. I'd like to not have to make hasty
> > decisions right now (before 4.9).
>
> Do you think we will do that change for 4.10?
>
Yes. I always have big plans for the next Nepomuk release.
> If we wait until K5 we can break as much as we like...
>
Okay.
We will maintain binary compatibility.
>
> > Plus, it's not like you'll have to recompile a lot of stuff. The only
> > things that depend on nepomuk-core right now are nepomuk-kde-config and
> > nepomuk-kde-kio.
> >
> > [1]
> http://community.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/Irc_meeting_nepomuk_frameworks
> >
> >
> > hugs and kisses
> >
> > /Sune
> >
> > >
> > > On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > >> On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa <me@vhanda.in <mailto:me@vhanda.in>>
> > wrote:
> > >>> @Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in
> > >>> nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to break
> > a lot of
> > >>> things.
> > >>
> > >> NACK.
> > >>
> > >> this is a completely no go.
> > >>
> > >> /Sune
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Vishesh Handa
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nepomuk mailing list
> > Nepomuk@kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>
--
Vishesh Handa
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Sebastian Trüg \
<span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:trueg@kde.org" \
target="_blank">trueg@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div class="im">On 05/17/2012 10:08 PM, Vishesh Handa \
wrote:<br> ><br>
><br>
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela <<a \
href="mailto:nospam@vuorela.dk">nospam@vuorela.dk</a><br> </div>> <mailto:<a \
href="mailto:nospam@vuorela.dk">nospam@vuorela.dk</a>>> wrote:<br> ><br>
> On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg <<a \
href="mailto:trueg@kde.org">trueg@kde.org</a> <mailto:<a \
href="mailto:trueg@kde.org">trueg@kde.org</a>>><br> <div class="im">> \
wrote:<br> > > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard \
are<br> > the DBus<br>
> > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are<br>
> > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces...<br>
><br>
> Great. thanks.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Can't we just break binary compatibility for 4.10. Just this once?<br>
><br>
> @Sebastian: Do you really want to have to deprecate the<br>
> QueryServiceClient as mentioned in [1]? I rather not have stuff like<br>
> that lying around in Nepomuk2. I'd like to not have to make hasty<br>
> decisions right now (before 4.9).<br>
<br>
</div>Do you think we will do that change for 4.10?<br></blockquote><div><br>Yes. I \
always have big plans for the next Nepomuk release.<br> <br></div><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid \
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
If we wait until K5 we can break as much as we \
like...<br></blockquote><div><br>Okay.<br><br>We will maintain binary \
compatibility.<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt \
0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br>
> Plus, it's not like you'll have to recompile a lot of stuff. The \
only<br> > things that depend on nepomuk-core right now are nepomuk-kde-config \
and<br> > nepomuk-kde-kio.<br>
><br>
> [1] <a href="http://community.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/Irc_meeting_nepomuk_frameworks" \
target="_blank">http://community.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/Irc_meeting_nepomuk_frameworks</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> hugs and kisses<br>
><br>
> /Sune<br>
><br>
> ><br>
> > On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:<br>
</div>> >> On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa <<a \
href="mailto:me@vhanda.in">me@vhanda.in</a> <mailto:<a \
href="mailto:me@vhanda.in">me@vhanda.in</a>>><br> <div class="im">> \
wrote:<br> > >>> @Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary \
compatibility in<br> > >>> nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. \
We still need to break<br> > a lot of<br>
> >>> things.<br>
> >><br>
> >> NACK.<br>
> >><br>
> >> this is a completely no go.<br>
> >><br>
> >> /Sune<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> ><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Vishesh Handa<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> Nepomuk mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Nepomuk@kde.org">Nepomuk@kde.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk" \
target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk</a><br> \
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><span \
style="color:rgb(192,192,192)">Vishesh Handa</span><br><br>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic