[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime
From:       Vishesh Handa <me () vhanda ! in>
Date:       2012-05-17 20:20:36
Message-ID: CAOPTMKDLS-=NJZ_6mOm1fP8RtgMus172dV3my-Arej7x75y-JA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk> wrote:

> On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg <trueg@kde.org> wrote:
> > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus
> > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are
> > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces...
>
> Great. thanks.
>

Can't we just break binary compatibility for 4.10. Just this once?

@Sebastian: Do you really want to have to deprecate the QueryServiceClient
as mentioned in [1]? I rather not have stuff like that lying around in
Nepomuk2. I'd like to not have to make hasty decisions right now (before
4.9).

Plus, it's not like you'll have to recompile a lot of stuff. The only
things that depend on nepomuk-core right now are nepomuk-kde-config and
nepomuk-kde-kio.

[1] http://community.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/Irc_meeting_nepomuk_frameworks


> hugs and kisses
>
> /Sune
>
> >
> > On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> >> On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa <me@vhanda.in> wrote:
> >>> @Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in
> >>> nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to break a lot
> of
> >>> things.
> >>
> >> NACK.
> >>
> >> this is a completely no go.
> >>
> >> /Sune
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>


-- 
Vishesh Handa

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:nospam@vuorela.dk" \
target="_blank">nospam@vuorela.dk</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div class="im">On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg &lt;<a \
href="mailto:trueg@kde.org">trueg@kde.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt; I think we can \
manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus<br> &gt; interfaces. But \
since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are<br> &gt; supposed to be used \
instead of the dbus interfaces...<br> <br>
</div>Great. thanks.<br></blockquote><div><br>Can&#39;t we just break binary \
compatibility for 4.10. Just this once?<br><br>@Sebastian: Do you really want to have \
to deprecate the QueryServiceClient as mentioned in [1]? I rather not have stuff like \
that lying around in Nepomuk2. I&#39;d like to not have to make hasty decisions right \
now (before 4.9).<br> <br>Plus, it&#39;s not like you&#39;ll have to recompile a lot \
of stuff. The only things that depend on nepomuk-core right now are \
nepomuk-kde-config and nepomuk-kde-kio.<br><br>[1] <a \
href="http://community.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/Irc_meeting_nepomuk_frameworks">http://community.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/Irc_meeting_nepomuk_frameworks</a><br>
 <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <br>
hugs and kisses<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
/Sune<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa &lt;<a \
href="mailto:me@vhanda.in">me@vhanda.in</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt;&gt;&gt; @Packagers: \
We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in<br> &gt;&gt;&gt; nepomuk-core. At \
least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to break a lot of<br> &gt;&gt;&gt; things.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; NACK.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; this is a completely no go.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; /Sune<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><span \
style="color:rgb(192,192,192)">Vishesh Handa</span><br><br>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]